Published On: March 4th, 2022|By |Categories: Market Updates|1.9 min read|

This is the summary of our weekly update, you can read the full blog here

Market declines resulting directly from conflict situations tend to be shallow and temporary, provided the event remains contained. In this piece we look a little deeper into this with particular reference to the current economic backdrop.

Tables such as the one below are often pulled out in crisis events such as we have today.

S&P 500 Performance Around Select Geopolitical/Military Events

Source: Strategas Research Partners

The basic point from the table is clear: on average the market recovers quickly from external shocks. Looking a little more deeply we see that on the three occasions (highlighted in grey) where a period of economic contraction was already underway, the exogenous event reinforced the trend in place.

So a more accurate description would be to say that the external shock is far less influential than the pre-existing market trend. If the market was already fundamentally strong, the external shock is temporary: any decline is shallow. On the other hand if the market was already fundamentally in a downtrend – it continues down.

So the most important consideration for the portfolio today is not the shock of the war itself, but rather to remind ourselves of where we were already.

The broad consensus prior to the Ukraine invasion, was that whilst inflation risks were on the rise, policy makers would not make any large errors, inflation would come under control and the backdrop of economic and earnings growth would continue.

So the trend was basically positive. The important issue to note, however, is the effect that the war has on the inputs to this trend. A more detailed discussion is available in our blog, but we can summarise by saying that on a number of fronts – energy, hard commodities, food supply – the war is making inflation worse and is therefore likely to effect the underlying trend negatively.

So what is the conclusion? The situation is finely balanced. A strong positive for your portfolio remains the continued outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks. This trend was well underway prior to the Ukraine event, and remains intact.

Nonetheless: this a period of uncertainty where it pays to follow the market behaviour very closely, and potentially be more active than usual. In the weeks prior to the Ukraine invasion we had already raised cash levels. Whether or not these will deployed in the coming weeks depends on how events unfold – both the number of risks as well as the number of opportunities looks set to increase.

Regardless of the economic developments, we do of course hope, like everyone else, that world leaders will reach a solution so that everyone affected by this conflict can soon move again in freedom.


Enter your email address below to receive macro updates directly in your inbox. Once a week, up to date forever. Unsubscribe whenever, wherever you want.


David Williams (1970) is responsible for the investment policy of Mpartners. After a brief career in diplomacy with the Ministry of Foreign affairs in Barbados, David joined Insinger de Beaufort asset management in 1997 and became a director in 2002. He was responsible for the investment team and the investment funds (long-only and hedged). His specialism is European equities. David holds a B.A. (Hons) from the University of Kent, an M.Sc. from the London School of Economics and an M.B.A. from Nijenrode university.